We welcome any query on Who When Where. If you have previously posted it on another forum (including the old WDYTYA forum), please state this in your opening post - this will save people redoing the research which has been done before: they can look at it and possibly go further with it.

Search found 361 matches

by AdrianBruce
02 Aug 2023, 12:18
Forum: Military
Topic: Fold3 - New UK Military Records (WW1)
Replies: 21
Views: 3314

Re: Fold3 - New UK Military Records (WW1)

Have you got the details so I can have a look sometime?
by AdrianBruce
31 Jul 2023, 15:57
Forum: Military
Topic: Fold3 - New UK Military Records (WW1)
Replies: 21
Views: 3314

Re: Fold3 - New UK Military Records (WW1)

... Incidentally the all access sub includes a membership to newspapers.com BUT doesn't allow full access to the site Ooh err... :( I have a vague idea I read something about a further restriction but since I don't have a newspapers.com - or Fold3 - subs, I forgot what it was. Thanks for the warning.
by AdrianBruce
30 Jul 2023, 22:13
Forum: Military
Topic: Fold3 - New UK Military Records (WW1)
Replies: 21
Views: 3314

Re: Fold3 - New UK Military Records (WW1)

I suggest you watch out around 11 November - Fold3 does seem to get the occasional free days, though normally restricted to specific topics. I've certainly picked up the odd WW1 Pension record. (That's the real Pension records - from the Western Front Association).
by AdrianBruce
30 Jul 2023, 16:08
Forum: Military
Topic: Fold3 - New UK Military Records (WW1)
Replies: 21
Views: 3314

Re: Fold3 - New UK Military Records (WW1)

One should also be able to fully access the records with the full Ancestry sub unless they have changed the rules since my sub expired. Depends what you mean by "Full"... My "Full" membership is actually officially a "Worldwide" membership. There is a step beyond which...
by AdrianBruce
27 Jul 2023, 12:00
Forum: Genealogy chat
Topic: Ancestry Hints
Replies: 2
Views: 657

Re: Ancestry Hints

Mind you... Slightly playing Devil's Advocate here - what if the death that you have for him is wrong? And the 1939 was the first evidence that you'd actually deceased the wrong George?
by AdrianBruce
14 Jul 2023, 23:35
Forum: Genealogy chat
Topic: GRO (England & Wales) Digital Images
Replies: 12
Views: 2843

Re: GRO (England & Wales) Digital Images

... GRO are correct - for all registration purposes a maiden name is the name in which a woman "first contracts a marriage", usually, but not always , their name at birth. So an unmarried woman doesn't have one, hence the "dash" in the on-line GRO indexes. Thanks for the succinc...
by AdrianBruce
13 Jul 2023, 12:58
Forum: Genealogy chat
Topic: GRO (England & Wales) Digital Images
Replies: 12
Views: 2843

Re: GRO (England & Wales) Digital Images

I succumbed - one of my long-standing mysteries is a Frank Taylor who appears as an 8-year-old in the 1891 census. He's living in my GG-GM's household and is just described as her grandson. Similar in 1901 and 1911, just adding 10y each time. Unfortunately, he's b Newton Heath in the 1st census and ...
by AdrianBruce
12 Jul 2023, 22:31
Forum: Genealogy chat
Topic: Canadian census 1921 and 1931
Replies: 2
Views: 1251

Re: Canadian census 1921 and 1931

1931 is there on Ancestry - https://www.ancestry.co.uk/search/collections/62640/ (I went to their Card Catalogue , filtered by location Canada , then clicked Census & Electoral Rolls - the 1931 Census of Canada is at the top of the list if you are sorting by Date Added.) It is indeed searchable ...
by AdrianBruce
06 Jul 2023, 23:31
Forum: Genealogy chat
Topic: GRO (England & Wales) Digital Images
Replies: 12
Views: 2843

Re: GRO (England & Wales) Digital Images

Thanks for the heads-up - and warnings...
by AdrianBruce
24 Jun 2023, 23:11
Forum: Genealogy chat
Topic: WDYTYA 2023 Series
Replies: 20
Views: 2159

Re: WDYTYA 2023 Series

... No, I meant Matooskie is suddenly declared his ancestor, with no lead up. They may have known a lot about her, but their audience didn’t :D It didn’t help that kevin kept referring to his ancestor as his great-great-great-great-great-grand… etc rather than using numbers like my 5’ggmother. ... ...