We welcome any query on Who When Where. If you have previously posted it on another forum (including the old WDYTYA forum), please state this in your opening post - this will save people redoing the research which has been done before: they can look at it and possibly go further with it.
Search found 318 matches
- 31 Aug 2023, 14:16
- Forum: General research queries
- Topic: Samuel Allcock 1753
- Replies: 17
- Views: 2598
Re: Samuel Allcock 1753
http://www.hucknalltorkardhistory.co.uk/sources.htm Web Resources Transcript of baptisms and burials only, 1728-1851, by the wonderful Maureen Newton. Be very wary of that new viewer. Bit harsh. Nothing to be wary about, it's not perfect of course. I don't use it very often, but it has its uses. Fro...
- 28 Aug 2023, 22:37
- Forum: General research queries
- Topic: Samuel Allcock 1753
- Replies: 17
- Views: 2598
Re: Samuel Allcock 1753
The film has 1415 images in total. Sticking the DGS number into their film viewer, the result is that the film is broken up into the different items https://www.familysearch.org/records/images/search-results?imageGroupNumbers=8068205 Hucknall Torkard has 79 images for overseers records But in them, ...
- 28 Aug 2023, 16:38
- Forum: General research queries
- Topic: Samuel Allcock 1753
- Replies: 17
- Views: 2598
Re: Samuel Allcock 1753
The PR Transcripts for 1556-1860 are available to view. I had a quick look, and found lots of church warden accounts, and bastardy Records etc. The Birth, Marriages and Deaths are supposed to be there too, but with over 1400 images to look through, may be a bit of a slog to find. Much easier to fin...
- 27 Aug 2023, 12:04
- Forum: General research queries
- Topic: Samuel Allcock 1753
- Replies: 17
- Views: 2598
Re: Samuel Allcock 1753
Baptisms to Samuel and Ann Alcock/Allcock at Hucknall Torkard, 1773-1797
Maybe
Burial there, 20 March 1807, of Ann Allcock. Age 51?
Burial, 18 April 1812, Samuel Allcock. Age 81.
(There is a big age difference!)
Baptism at Hucknall Torkard, 20 Dec 1730
Samuel Alcock(e), son of Joel and Hannah
Maybe
Burial there, 20 March 1807, of Ann Allcock. Age 51?
Burial, 18 April 1812, Samuel Allcock. Age 81.
(There is a big age difference!)
Baptism at Hucknall Torkard, 20 Dec 1730
Samuel Alcock(e), son of Joel and Hannah
- 21 Aug 2023, 18:47
- Forum: General research queries
- Topic: Two Bettys or One Betty?
- Replies: 6
- Views: 1187
Re: Two Bettys or One Betty?
Have you got the wrong birth reg for Mary? WILKINSON, MARY Mother's Maiden Surname: CAFFREY GRO Reference: 1844 J Quarter in CHORLTON Volume 20 Page 215 You can now get a digital image for just £2.50 Local indexes on Lancashire BMD give the maiden name as Caffey (sub-district Ardwick) There is a Wil...
- 14 Aug 2023, 21:27
- Forum: General research queries
- Topic: Davisons MIA
- Replies: 9
- Views: 1397
Re: Davisons MIA
Hi An 1841 possibility? Though impossible to know for sure. In Battersea, Surrey Henry Davidson, 20, Not Born County Male Servant. I guess to John Taylor, Cowkeeper. https://www.familysearch.org/ark:/61903/1:1:MQK4-Y23 Battersea is good for Chelsea (and Pimlico) Just the other side of the river. In ...
- 14 Aug 2023, 20:23
- Forum: General research queries
- Topic: Davisons MIA
- Replies: 9
- Views: 1397
Re: Davisons MIA
on 1851* census with parents and a younger sister Younger sister's baptism at St. Barnabas, Pimlico, 5 January 1851 Born 30 December 1850 Sarah Parents Henry + Elizabeth Davison Abode Crawleys yard Father a Carter So, maybe this death in 1850? DAVIS, RICHARD THOMAS Age at Death (in years): 3 GRO Re...
- 26 Mar 2023, 10:33
- Forum: General research queries
- Topic: Martin Bond Smith
- Replies: 23
- Views: 1796
Re: Martin Bond Smith
Going back to Maria Walker nee Martin (sorry!), her baptism could be 15 March 1818, Speen . Parents Richard and Mary Martin. Abode Speenhamland. Father Horsekeeper. Others there Mary Ann, 1813, Richard, 1815, Frances, 1820 They may be in Hammersmith by 1824. If the parents married in Berkshire, the...
- 25 Mar 2023, 09:18
- Forum: General research queries
- Topic: Martin Bond Smith
- Replies: 23
- Views: 1796
Re: Martin Bond Smith
Hi You (and Mo) are right, always check the witnesses. It paid off for me recently as well, and I was finally able to pin down the correct marriage for one of my ancestors, John Brooks. So were your Smiths in High Street, Fulham, in 1841? Jno, 66, Elizbth, 55, both not born county, and Jno, 14, born...
- 25 Mar 2023, 08:47
- Forum: General research queries
- Topic: Martin Bond Smith
- Replies: 23
- Views: 1796
Re: Martin Bond Smith
Well done, NN. Great research! The signatures of Martin and Maria Smith are very similar to the ones on their own wedding. Not surprising, as it was only a few months earlier! So in 1851 in Fulham you have John Smith x 2, Elizabeth Smith (wife of John senior), and a nephew as well. The older Smiths ...