We welcome any query on Who When Where. If you have previously posted it on another forum (including the old WDYTYA forum), please state this in your opening post - this will save people redoing the research which has been done before: they can look at it and possibly go further with it.

Stepney, east London

A space for genealogy-related conversations.
Post Reply
Thunder
Posts: 438
Joined: 14 Jun 2020, 01:43

Stepney, east London

Post by Thunder »

Does anyone remembering being told at Primary School to cross your 't's on letters such as Stepney and not to write them as 'Slepney', there are 185 cases in the ancestry database and for once it is not ancestry's fault but the writer's!.
jonwarrn
Posts: 318
Joined: 03 Jul 2020, 19:49

Re: Stepney, east London

Post by jonwarrn »

Thunder wrote: 28 Sep 2022, 04:10Stepney, east London
Is it Stepney, east London
or
Stepney, East London?
jonwarrn
Posts: 318
Joined: 03 Jul 2020, 19:49

Re: Stepney, east London

Post by jonwarrn »

Thunder wrote: 28 Sep 2022, 04:10it is not ancestry's fault but the writer's!.
It is not necessary, or good English, to put a full stop after an exclamation mark.
jonwarrn
Posts: 318
Joined: 03 Jul 2020, 19:49

Re: Stepney, east London

Post by jonwarrn »

Thunder wrote: 28 Sep 2022, 04:10 cross your 't's on letters such as Stepney
Stepney is a letter?
Mick Loney
Posts: 377
Joined: 15 Jun 2020, 07:27

Re: Stepney, east London

Post by Mick Loney »

jonwarrn wrote: 28 Sep 2022, 11:29
Thunder wrote: 28 Sep 2022, 04:10it is not ancestry's fault but the writer's!.
It is not necessary, or good English, to put a full stop after an exclamation mark.
It should read ‘it is not necessary, nor good english’ :D

Not only is it not necessary, it is wrong! An exclamation mark ends a sentence and actually contains a full stop! (Same as a question mark)
jonwarrn
Posts: 318
Joined: 03 Jul 2020, 19:49

Re: Stepney, east London

Post by jonwarrn »

You went to the best primary school, Mick :)
VALLMO9
Posts: 766
Joined: 13 Jun 2020, 21:28

Re: Stepney, east London

Post by VALLMO9 »

Thunder wrote: 28 Sep 2022, 04:10 there are 185 cases in the ancestry database
Don't you mean instances (not cases)? I'm amused that someone has the wherewithal to count records displaying unconventional/faulty grammar on Ancestry. And can I add that the exclamation mark loses it's subtlety when frequently overused.
Post Reply