London Soldiers' Home
Posted: 03 Nov 2020, 16:52
After re-visiting my grandmother’s 1911 marriage certificate, I’ve realised that she and the groom used the London Soldiers’ Home as their residence. The Home isn’t mentioned by name as such, but the address is: 63 Buckingham Gate, SW.
After making the address connection I began researching the various Soldiers’ Homes established by Mrs Louisa Daniell in the 19th century. There’s even vintage postcards on eBay of the London branch.
My question is: Why would the bride and groom give the Soldiers’ Home for their address?
Three months before the marriage, my grandmother was boarding with a soldier and his wife in Colchester, according to the 1911 census. No occupation given for my granny. (Her parents had frowned on her choice of husband; therefore my granny made several attempts to elope).
The groom was stationed at the Meeanee Barracks in Colchester in 1911. He served with the Cameronians (Scottish Rifles) from 1904-1921. I have his service papers and nothing suggests he was connected to nearby Wellington Barracks c1911.
I’ve also reviewed the London Soldiers’ Home residents in the 1911 census. I don’t see anyone with an obvious connection to my granny or the groom.
If anyone has any thoughts or suggestions as to why the London Soldiers’ Home address was stipulated at the time of marriage, I’d be most grateful to receive them.
As a curious aside, I’ve studied the bride’s signature on the marriage record – and it looks nothing like my granny’s handwriting. Very odd indeed.
I grew-up with my granny. Therefore I’m quite familiar with her handwriting. I’m not at all suggesting the bride isn’t my granny, but it’s strange to see such unfamiliar handwriting. She was extremely well-educated, so it's not like she couldn't write and had someone else sign her name.
After making the address connection I began researching the various Soldiers’ Homes established by Mrs Louisa Daniell in the 19th century. There’s even vintage postcards on eBay of the London branch.
My question is: Why would the bride and groom give the Soldiers’ Home for their address?
Three months before the marriage, my grandmother was boarding with a soldier and his wife in Colchester, according to the 1911 census. No occupation given for my granny. (Her parents had frowned on her choice of husband; therefore my granny made several attempts to elope).
The groom was stationed at the Meeanee Barracks in Colchester in 1911. He served with the Cameronians (Scottish Rifles) from 1904-1921. I have his service papers and nothing suggests he was connected to nearby Wellington Barracks c1911.
I’ve also reviewed the London Soldiers’ Home residents in the 1911 census. I don’t see anyone with an obvious connection to my granny or the groom.
If anyone has any thoughts or suggestions as to why the London Soldiers’ Home address was stipulated at the time of marriage, I’d be most grateful to receive them.
As a curious aside, I’ve studied the bride’s signature on the marriage record – and it looks nothing like my granny’s handwriting. Very odd indeed.
I grew-up with my granny. Therefore I’m quite familiar with her handwriting. I’m not at all suggesting the bride isn’t my granny, but it’s strange to see such unfamiliar handwriting. She was extremely well-educated, so it's not like she couldn't write and had someone else sign her name.